| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 |
81. In Honor of TEST & improving UI - A new chat feature - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yes, I am talking about in-game - IAINTMADBRO. Im just tired of seizures.
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2012.05.04 16:28:00
|
82. In Honor of TEST & improving UI - A new chat feature - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Considering the full name is "Test Alliance Please Ignore" Can we please get an option in the chat to BLOCK an entire ALLIANCE . I think it would be quite fitting and we would be honoring their request. They are some of the worst and most unima...
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2012.05.04 15:21:00
|
83. Suicide Ganks LAME - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dang - this thread is still on the front page!!!! Back in the days this would have been pushed to page 4 in less than 2 hours with much more interesting threads and ideas replacing it. THIRTY PERCENT of the front page is related to suicide g...
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2012.05.01 19:18:00
|
84. Suicide Ganks LAME - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Brujo Loco wrote: Someone annoyed at suicide ganks in EVE???? Yes, I was new in 2003.
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2012.05.01 15:43:00
|
85. Suicide Ganks LAME - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Benny Ohu wrote: Spaceman Jack wrote: Benny Ohu wrote: Mining is passe and not very creative Whine threads are passe and not very creative This reply is pase and not very creative. Repeating someone else's jab is passe and not ve...
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2012.05.01 14:48:00
|
86. The Goons and Mittani - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mittani is... meh. Looser.
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2012.05.01 13:40:00
|
87. Suicide Ganks LAME - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Benny Ohu wrote: Mining is passe and not very creative Whine threads are passe and not very creative This reply is pase and not very creative.
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2012.05.01 13:34:00
|
88. Suicide Ganks LAME - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just saying - its pase already and just not creative. Yawn @hulkageddon/BurnJita Death MUST have meaning!
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2012.05.01 13:22:00
|
89. 9th Birthday Gift - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Although i TRULY appreciate CCP giving gifts... I have to agree on this one. I've been playing this 9 years and non of the gifts here tantalize me in the least. I have several of each of the ships being given away and all the skills. Whats left?
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2012.05.01 13:19:00
|
90. Hilmar and Obama: Both going down in flames in 2012 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The difference is: Himlar DOES what he says he is going to do; He's a puppet master Obama doesn't do **** of what he says; He's a puppet
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2011.09.05 23:40:00
|
91. Official Petition to change... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
LOL... It has not - I could care less, But as long as we making excuses for things...
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2011.08.23 16:31:00
|
92. Guideline for getting people to NULL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They did NOT make it more attractive. Sure you can make money out there, but the mechanics fail and the last SOV sucked major balls. Its a total pan in the ass. But I guess if you suck at building... destroy?
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2011.08.23 16:29:00
|
93. Guideline for getting people to NULL - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
By making it MORE attractive and NOT making everything else LESS attractive Tis all thank you
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2011.08.23 16:22:00
|
94. petition to bring back 15km warp in - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Spaceman Jack on 17/08/2011 15:19:11 Interesting how you know people will potentially un-sub because of a WTZ removal - but you think you will have more targets. IMHO, fewer sub = fewer targets. WTZ was introduced so that people w...
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2011.08.17 15:17:00
|
95. Nullsec, training wheels and such - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ice and LVL 4 agents in Highsec... is this REALLY the cause for the vacancy in NullSec... come on. After living there for most of my 8 years in EVE, I have a hard time buying that. Food for thought when it come to subscriptions: I recently pulled...
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2011.08.16 15:14:00
|
96. What have i been paying with? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So vanity items will not be destructible because someone paid real money for them? WTF have I been paying my subscription with then for the past 8 years? Seems like real money to me and my bank account. By that logic, shouldn't all my ships, item...
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2011.07.12 13:34:00
|
97. Possible solution to get more and new people to 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Calfis Originally by: Heedless Why would I move my operations.... You have been playing EVE like its a single player mission grinding game from day one haven't you? WIN I have a buddy who has been play...
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2011.05.19 18:23:00
|
98. The missioning change that even the DEV's forgot - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Roq Godslayer Perhaps the changes were not made to dumb down the system, but to make the system more assessable to the average thinker. Something tells me the first half of that statement contradicts the second half.
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2011.05.18 04:40:00
|
99. 0.0 HIghways - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I stand by my first and last sentence.
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2011.05.18 04:22:00
|
100. 0.0 HIghways - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
New JB nerfs are, simply put, POO POO. As currently described to us, the logic is POO POO as well. I can (almost) understand Cap ship restrictions, but why only one JB per system? We all want people to go to 0.0 and live out there, but then we t...
- by Spaceman Jack - at 2011.05.17 21:01:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |